Resources

Justices Overturn Key Campaign Limits

The New York Times by Adam Liptak

January 22, 2010

WASHINGTON — Sweeping aside a century-old understanding and overruling two important precedents, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.

The ruling was a vindication, the majority said, of the First Amendment’s most basic free speech principle — that the government has no business regulating political speech. The dissenters said allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace will corrupt democracy.read more >>

Legal Guidelines For Funding Nonpartisan Civic Engagement

The laws and IRS code's regulations on civic engagement grantmaking, often confuse funders, new and seasoned, raising some tough questions.read more >>

Charities Spend Millions on Census Outreach

National Public Radio by Pam Fessler

Charitable foundations and nonprofits are taking an unusually active role this year in trying to get an accurate census count. They say the people they serve have the most to benefit but are also among the least likely to participate.

Most Americans will get their 2010 census questionnaire sometime around March 15. Every 10 years, it's a challenge getting everyone to fill out their census forms and send them back to the government. read more >>

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Grows into a Political Force

The Los Angeles Times by Tom Hamburger

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is building a large-scale grass-roots political operation that has begun to rival those of the major political parties, funded by record-setting amounts of money raised from corporations and wealthy individuals.

The chamber has signed up some 6 million individuals who are not chamber members and has begun asking them to help with lobbying and, soon, with get-out-the-vote efforts in upcoming congressional campaigns.read more >>

To Fix the Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision, Copy the Brits

U.S. News and World Report by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy

Last month, I testified before Congress about the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, urging new protections for American shareholders. My plea was simple: copy the British.

What does the U.K. have that the U.S. lacks, but sorely needs? Not a queen, a parliament, or a home secretary, but a law passed in 2000 that requires British companies to seek authorization from their shareholders for corporate political spending. read more >>

A Bipartisan Push to Clean Up the Supreme Court's Mess

The Washington Post by E.J. Dionne Jr.

In a city where the phrase "bipartisan initiative" is becoming an oxymoron, the urgency of containing the damage the Supreme Court could do to our electoral system creates an opportunity for a rare convergence of interest and principle.

At issue is the court's astonishingly naive decision in January that allows unlimited corporate spending to influence elections. Its 5 to 4 ruling in the Citizens United case was a shocking instance of judicial overreach and reflected an utter indifference to how politics works.read more >>

States Rush to Catch up with Campaign Finance Ruling

The Arizona Capitol Times by Jeremy Duda

Arizona is moving quickly to rewrite its laws in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations and labor unions to spend money directly on political campaigns, but a handful of states might be in legal limbo until after the 2010 elections.

More than a half-dozen states have major questions hanging over their campaign finance laws after the Supreme Court’s January ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which found that bans on direct spending by corporations and unions in political campaigns are unconstitutional.read more >>

Campaign Finance Now in Uncharted Territory

The Arizona Capitol Times by Jeremy Duda

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that corporations and labor unions can spend freely on political campaigns, Arizona has a simple choice - create new regulations to monitor that type of spending, or run the risk of an entire election cycle being dominated by millions of dollars worth of anonymous advertising.read more >>

Missing the Tea Party

The New York Times by Linda Greenhouse

read more >>

The real surprise of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which magnified the ability of corporations to spend money in political campaigns, is how widely disliked the ruling is across the ideological spectrum. After more than a month, the storm set off by the Citizens United ruling is still raging.

New York’s Nooks Are a Challenge to Census Takers

The New York Times by Sam Roberts

One River Place blends easily into the dense forest of Manhattan skyscrapers, its vanity address camouflaging its precise location. Still, even in New York City, a 40-story tower containing 900 apartments should be difficult to miss.

But the Census Bureau did. read more >>

Grant Makers Commit Millions to Help Ensure Accurate Census, At stake in the tally: More than $4-trillion in money governments apportion to the people charities serve

The Chronicle of Philanthropy by Marty Michaels

As the 2010 census nears its official start in March, nonprofit leaders are raising serious concerns about the government’s ability to achieve an accurate tally in this once-a-decade population count.

In response, foundations have poured tens of millions of dollars into nonprofit census efforts, but many nonprofit leaders say much more is needed.read more >>

A Welcome, if Partial, Fix

The New York Times by The New York Times Editorial Board

“Hi. I’m the C.E.O. of (Fill in the Blank) Corporation, and I approved this message.” If Senator Charles Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen have their way, you’ll be hearing those sorts of disclosures in political ads for November’s Congressional elections. read more >>

Poll: Large majority opposes Supreme Court's decision on campaign financing

The Washington Post by Dan Eggen

Americans of both parties overwhelmingly oppose a Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations and unions to spend as much as they want on political campaigns, and most favor new limits on such spending, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Eight in 10 poll respondents say they oppose the high court's Jan. 21 decision to allow unfettered corporate political spending, with 65 percent "strongly" opposed. Nearly as many backed congressional action to curb the ruling, with 72 percent in favor of reinstating limits. read more >>

Time For Obama To Right The FEC: The Citizens United Ruling Has Put The Election Agency On The Spot

National Journal by Eliza Newlin Carney

Feb. 16, 2010

Congressional Democrats have moved quickly to sketch out legislation that would blunt the impact of the Supreme Court's recent ruling to free up corporate political spending. But the first official response to the watershed Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission may come from an unlikely quarter: the FEC.read more >>

Services in The City Rely on Poll’s Accuracy for Federal Funding

San Francisco Examiner by Katie Worth

Some 100,000 people who were living in San Francisco on April 1, 2000, were not counted by that year’s Census workers, city officials have claimed.read more >>

New Option for the States on Inmates in the Census

The New York Times by Sam Roberts

For decades, predominantly rural and Republican districts have had extra clout in state and local legislative bodies because their large inmate populations were counted as local residents in apportioning representation. Now, the Census Bureau has agreed to give states a tool that could dilute the political power of those districts.read more >>

Dems Seek Quick Fix on Campaign Finance

The Washington Times by Stephen Dinan

Buoyed by polls showing the public is fed up with money influencing politics, Democrats are beginning to settle on options for curbing the Supreme Court's recent ruling that freed corporations and unions to enter the political fray with unlimited ads. read more >>

Investors Seek More Disclosure on Political Spending

The Wall Street Journal by Scott Thurm

An effort by activist shareholders to prod companies to disclose political contributions is taking on new urgency following last month's Supreme Court decision loosening restrictions on corporate political spending.

The Council of Institutional Investors and the Center on Political Accountability this month plan to send a letter urging disclosure to the chairmen of 430 companies. Activist investors also have filed shareholder resolutions urging disclosure at 54 of those companies, according to proxy adviser RiskMetrics Group Inc.read more >>

A Wake-Up Call on Campaign Finance Reform

AolNews by Tara Malloy

The Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission turns back the clock on almost a century's worth of campaign finance regulation. The court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, held for the first time that a corporation is entitled to the same First Amendment protections for its electoral spending as an individual citizen. Suddenly, the billions of dollars in corporate treasuries are available to advocate the election or defeat of candidates. read more >>

How to Address Corporate Political Spending Recent Supreme Court Ruling Calls For Response

AP/Lauren Victoria Burke by Alex DeMots

In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court late last month ruled that corporations are permitted to spend unlimited amounts of money on independent political advertising in U.S. elections. While conservatives and libertarians are cheering the ruling as a victory for free speech, many progressives are warning of a coming flood of corporate money buying elections, and pushing for a legislative response. read more >>

Lobbyists Rush to Hold the Floodgates Open

The White House Blog by Norm Eisen

We noted with interest reports that subsidiaries of foreign corporations from across the globe have launched a lobbying campaign in Washington to protect their newfound power to influence American elections under the Citizens United case. About 160 of these U.S. subsidiaries of foreign-owned or controlled corporations are involved in a lobbying group trying to stop President Obama and Congress from enacting limits on their spending in political campaigns. Worse still, the lobbyist leading the effort refused to disclose all the companies involved in the lobbying campaign.read more >>

Judge Orders More Testing of Vote Machines

The NJ Times by Meir Rinde

February 01, 2010

A judge ordered a panel of experts to evaluate the security of New Jersey’s 11,000 voting machines Monday but stopped short of decommissioning the Sequioa Voting Systems devices or requiring them to be retrofitted to produce a paper trail.read more >>

Supreme Court ruling calls for a populist revolt

The Washington Post by E.J. Dionne Jr.

"Populism" is the most overused and misused word in the lexicon of commentary. But thanks to a reckless decision by Chief Justice John Roberts's Supreme Court and the greed of the nation's financial barons, we have reached a true populist moment in American politics.

The Supreme Court's 5-to-4 decision last week giving American corporations the right to unlimited political spending was an astonishing display of judicial arrogance, overreach and unjustified activism.read more >>

Political Fallout From the Supreme Court Ruling

Caucus Blog by Jeff ZelenyThe New York Times by Jeff Zeleny

January 21, 2010

Even before their Massachusetts victory this week, Republicans already enjoyed a multitude of advantages in this year’s midterm elections. The Supreme Court has likely just delivered one more: money.read more >>

Citizens United v. the FEC: The Return of Corporate Influence Peddling?

ABC News by Matthew Mosk

January 13, 2010

As Supreme Court Weighs Landmark Case, Wealthy GOP Donors Bankroll Attack on Campaign Finance Law

The hotly anticipated Supreme Court case that could open the door to a flood of corporate money in political campaigns represents the latest thrust in a patient, carefully orchestrated bid to use legal challenges to undo the restrictions passed by Congress.read more >>

DOJ to Block Diebold Merger

NY Post by Josh Kosman

January 11, 2010

The Department of Justice is expected to file a lawsuit at month's end to block the already-completed merger of the nation's two largest voting-machine makers, including one that will service the city, The Post has learned.

According to a person close to the situation, the Justice Department's lawsuit, if successful, would effectively undo the merger of Diebold's Premier Elections Solutions with Election Systems & Software, a $5 million deal completed in September.read more >>

Really Big Money Politics

The New York Times by The New York Times Editorial Board

January 4, 2010

The nation’s hard times are proving to be boom times for the lobbying industry in Washington. Lobbyists are expected to easily break their record of $3.3 billion in annual business, raising an inevitable question: How much more in special-interest donations will be bagged by lawmakers as they are furiously lobbied on everything from health care reform to economic regulation? read more >>

The Passion of McCain-Feingold; Under attack from all angles, campaign finance legislation is dying a painful death

Politics magazine by Jeremy P. Jacobs

On a rather boring Wednesday evening in late October, Senators John McCain and Russell Feingold delivered speeches on the Senate floor. Their remarks were strikingly different than the cookie-cutter remarks on healthcare given by their colleagues. The Arizona Republican and Wisconsin Democrat were there to talk about a September Supreme Court case that has the potential to uproot their landmark campaign finance legislation and deregulate corporate spending in elections.read more >>

States in play: An early look at 2011 redistricting

The Washington Post by Chris Cillizza

December 29, 2009

The Census Bureau gave political junkies a gift last week with the release of its latest population estimates, data that give very good indications of which states are set to gain congressional seats and which will lose them in the 2011 redistricting process.

According to Polidata projections (the best in the business), eight states are positioned to gain one or more seats in the remapping and 10 states are slated to lose a seat or more.read more >>

Decade Brought Change To Campaign Finance

National Public Radio by Peter Overby

December 25, 2009

In January, the Supreme Court is expected to redefine how far corporations can go in spending money on federal elections.

At question is whether corporate money can be used to promote or attack candidates. The case is another milestone in the world of money and politics, a place where there's been a lot of upheaval over the past decade.

Public Financing

Back in 2000 the public financing system was a fixture of American politics. It helped to underwrite candidates from Gerald Ford to Bill Clinton.read more >>

Reapportionment Roundup

The New York Times by Bernie Becker, The Caucus blog

December 24, 2009

With the 2010 decennial census bearing down on us, the time for congressional reapportionment is right around the corner.

And, as The Times’s Damien Cave and others have reported, if the data the Census Bureau released this week is any indication, recent trends in how seats are allocated in the House of Representatives will continue this go-round.read more >>

Chicago's Census Prep Sets Pace for Rest of U.S.

Crain’s by Paul Merrion

Dec. 14, 2009

A local $1.2-million foundation-led effort to boost participation in the 2010 Census is putting the Chicago area at the forefront of preparations for the decennial head-counting.

“Some groups and some areas are not as energized as others,” U.S. Census Bureau Director Robert Groves said Monday at a press briefing in Washington, D. C. “Chicago is a model for other regions” because local nonprofits are able to pursue outreach efforts with funding from a group of foundations and Chicago-based Boeing Co. read more >>

The Parallel Census Universe: Philanthropy, Nonprofits and Promoting the Census

The Census Project Blog by Terri Ann Lowenthal

December 8, 2009

At a hearing last week, the House census subcommittee highlighted outreach and promotion activities for the 2010 count. The focus wasn’t on the Census Bureau’s extensive communications program but on grassroots organizations, state and local governments, and businesses – sectors that are operating in what I call a “parallel universe” to help ensure an inclusive count in all communities. read more >>

Securing the vote for all

The Washington Times by Rear Adm. James J. Carey

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

On Veterans Day, Americans honor those who have fought for this country and also those who are deployed. As a retired flag officer, I find my thoughts especially focused on my brothers and sisters in uniform far from home. As they risk their lives every day to safeguard our freedom, another routine sacrifice is often overlooked: the guarantee that their votes will be counted. read more >>

Philanthropy Must Change Culture and Rules in World of Money and Politics

The Chronicle of Philanthropy by Larry Ottinger

In a nation where large financial interests already dominate public policy, the Supreme Court is likely to issue a ruling soon that will make it easier for businesses and labor unions to spend money to engage in partisan political activity.

That action would widen a gulf between nonprofit groups and businesses and could further seriously diminish charities' and foundations' influence, relevance, and clout in shaping solutions to the nation's problems.read more >>

Election Reform in DC: A Model for the Progressive Administration of Elections

Demos Ideas|Action Blog by Steven Carbo

November 5, 2009

The District of Columbia, not commonly associated with innovative government, showed itself to be a real leader today with passage of far-reaching election reform legislation. The DC Council's vote today for the Omnibus Election Reform Act puts the District in the lead of states and localities with progressive election administration.read more >>

Ballot count by hand starts in Minneapolis

Minneapolis Star Tribune by Bob Von Sternberg and Steve Brandt

November 4, 2009

Most of the candidates who were on the ballot still can't be sure who won, because of the city's new method of voting.

Now the hard part starts.

The city's voters were apparently unfazed by the debut of ranked-choice voting Tuesday, but the inherent mathematical complexity of the new system will start unfolding this morning.read more >>

As Virginia goes, so goes not much

The Washington Post by Ruth Marcus

November 4, 2009

Advice to readers about the coming orgy of analysis about the New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial elections: Ignore it. Disquisitions on The Meaning of It All for President Obama or the 2009 results as a harbinger for Congress in 2010 have scant basis in reality.

Over-interpreting election results is an occupational hazard for political reporters. This problem is particularly acute in the year after a presidential contest, when we are suffering from a bad case of electoral withdrawal.read more >>

Contests serve as warning to Democrats: It's not 2008 anymore

The Washington Post by Dan Balz

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Off-year elections can be notoriously unreliable as predictors of the future, but as a window on how the political landscape may have changed in the year since President Obama won the White House, Tuesday's Republican victories in Virginia and New Jersey delivered clear warnings for the Democrats.read more >>

Political Foes Team Up To Improve Voter Registration

National Public Radio by Pam Fessler

November 3, 2009

Linda Graham helped register voters like Florence Dziamniski in 2008. Here, Dziamniski fills out a voter registration form outside a senior citizens home in Clairton, Pa.

In this lull between major elections, advisers from recent Republican and Democratic presidential campaigns have joined together to try to come up with a better way to register voters. read more >>

Justice Department to Monitor Elections in Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania

Reuters

WASHINGTON, Nov. 2 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Nov. 3, 2009, the Justice
Department will monitor elections in the following jurisdictions to ensure
compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and other federal voting rights
statutes: the cities of Lowell and Springfield, Mass.; the city of Hamtramck,
Mich.; Middlesex County and the borough of Penns Grove, N.J.; Orange County
and Queens, N.Y., and the city of Philadelphia.

Under the Voting Rights Act, the Justice Department is authorized to ask theread more >>

Justice Department to Monitor Elections in Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania

Thomson Reuters

Mon Nov 2, 2009

WASHINGTON, Nov. 2 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Nov. 3, 2009, the Justice
Department will monitor elections in the following jurisdictions to ensure
compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and other federal voting rights
statutes: the cities of Lowell and Springfield, Mass.; the city of Hamtramck,
Mich.; Middlesex County and the borough of Penns Grove, N.J.; Orange County
and Queens, N.Y., and the city of Philadelphia.

Under the Voting Rights Act, the Justice Department is authorized to ask theread more >>

Privacy Looms Over Gay Rights Vote

The New York Times by William Yardley

November 1, 2009

SEATTLE — At a time when voters in many states are using petitions to qualify ballot measures on issues from gay rights to property rights, a legal dispute over the identity of 138,000 petition signers here is raising new questions about privacy, free speech and elections in the Internet age.read more >>

Top civil rights attorney promises increased enforcement of discrimination laws

The Los Angeles Times by Teresa Watanabe

October 31, 2009

U.S. Assistant Atty. Gen. Thomas Perez ushers in an era of 'transformation and restoration' with pledges to fight housing bias, hate crimes and predatory lending, among other things.

The nation's top civil rights attorney vowed Friday to step up enforcement of laws against housing bias, hate crimes, racially targeted predatory lending and other discriminatory acts in what he called a new era of "transformation and restoration."read more >>

Trust, Antitrust and Your Vote

The New York Times by The New York Times Editorial Board

October 29, 2009

The nation’s largest voting machine manufacturer, Election Systems & Software, announced last month that it was buying the United States voting machine division of Diebold, its main competitor. The sale could mean that nearly 70 percent of the nation’s voting precincts would be served by a single corporation. That raises serious antitrust questions and serious concerns about the vulnerability of future elections.read more >>

California Would Lose Seats Under Census Change

The New York Times by Sam Roberts

October 28, 2009

A Republican senator’s proposal to count only United States citizens when reapportioning Congress would cost California five seats and New York and Illinois one each, according to an independent analysis of census data released Tuesday. Texas, which is projected to gain three seats after the 2010 census, would get only one.

The proposed change would spare Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan and Pennsylvania the expected loss of one seat each. Indiana, Montana, North Carolina, Oregon and South Carolina would each gain a seat.read more >>

As US population increases, Congress must adjust

The Christian Science Monitor (OpEd) by By Jane S. DeLung and Judith A. Himes

Tuesday, October 27

Princeton, N.J. – How would you feel if you knew that there was just one 911 operator in charge of answering and directing all the calls in your county? And that it had been this way for multiple decades, despite the fact that the population there has been steadily increasing over the years?

No matter how capable the operator may be, unless more operators were added to take the calls, the effectiveness of the whole 911 system could be distorted. This is akin to what's happening with the US government and Congress.read more >>

As US population increases, Congress must adjust

The Christian Science Monitor (OpEd) by By Jane S. DeLung and Judith A. Himes

Princeton, N.J. – How would you feel if you knew that there was just one 911 operator in charge of answering and directing all the calls in your county? And that it had been this way for multiple decades, despite the fact that the population there has been steadily increasing over the years?

No matter how capable the operator may be, unless more operators were added to take the calls, the effectiveness of the whole 911 system could be distorted. This is akin to what's happening with the US government and Congress.read more >>

Members are encouraged to sign in to view member-only content. 

credits | terms of use | give us feedback | © 2008 Funders' Committee for Civic Participation | 221 NW Second Avenue, Suite 207 Portland, OR 97209 | P: 503-505-5703