In The News

Justices Overturn Key Campaign Limits

The New York Times by Adam Liptak

January 22, 2010

WASHINGTON — Sweeping aside a century-old understanding and overruling two important precedents, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.

The ruling was a vindication, the majority said, of the First Amendment’s most basic free speech principle — that the government has no business regulating political speech. The dissenters said allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace will corrupt democracy.read more >>

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Grows into a Political Force

The Los Angeles Times by Tom Hamburger

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is building a large-scale grass-roots political operation that has begun to rival those of the major political parties, funded by record-setting amounts of money raised from corporations and wealthy individuals.

The chamber has signed up some 6 million individuals who are not chamber members and has begun asking them to help with lobbying and, soon, with get-out-the-vote efforts in upcoming congressional campaigns.read more >>

Charities Spend Millions on Census Outreach

National Public Radio by Pam Fessler

Charitable foundations and nonprofits are taking an unusually active role this year in trying to get an accurate census count. They say the people they serve have the most to benefit but are also among the least likely to participate.

Most Americans will get their 2010 census questionnaire sometime around March 15. Every 10 years, it's a challenge getting everyone to fill out their census forms and send them back to the government. read more >>

To Fix the Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision, Copy the Brits

U.S. News and World Report by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy

Last month, I testified before Congress about the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, urging new protections for American shareholders. My plea was simple: copy the British.

What does the U.K. have that the U.S. lacks, but sorely needs? Not a queen, a parliament, or a home secretary, but a law passed in 2000 that requires British companies to seek authorization from their shareholders for corporate political spending. read more >>

A Bipartisan Push to Clean Up the Supreme Court's Mess

The Washington Post by E.J. Dionne Jr.

In a city where the phrase "bipartisan initiative" is becoming an oxymoron, the urgency of containing the damage the Supreme Court could do to our electoral system creates an opportunity for a rare convergence of interest and principle.

At issue is the court's astonishingly naive decision in January that allows unlimited corporate spending to influence elections. Its 5 to 4 ruling in the Citizens United case was a shocking instance of judicial overreach and reflected an utter indifference to how politics works.read more >>

States Rush to Catch up with Campaign Finance Ruling

The Arizona Capitol Times by Jeremy Duda

Arizona is moving quickly to rewrite its laws in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allows corporations and labor unions to spend money directly on political campaigns, but a handful of states might be in legal limbo until after the 2010 elections.

More than a half-dozen states have major questions hanging over their campaign finance laws after the Supreme Court’s January ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which found that bans on direct spending by corporations and unions in political campaigns are unconstitutional.read more >>

Campaign Finance Now in Uncharted Territory

The Arizona Capitol Times by Jeremy Duda

Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that corporations and labor unions can spend freely on political campaigns, Arizona has a simple choice - create new regulations to monitor that type of spending, or run the risk of an entire election cycle being dominated by millions of dollars worth of anonymous advertising.read more >>

Missing the Tea Party

The New York Times by Linda Greenhouse

read more >>

The real surprise of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which magnified the ability of corporations to spend money in political campaigns, is how widely disliked the ruling is across the ideological spectrum. After more than a month, the storm set off by the Citizens United ruling is still raging.

New York’s Nooks Are a Challenge to Census Takers

The New York Times by Sam Roberts

One River Place blends easily into the dense forest of Manhattan skyscrapers, its vanity address camouflaging its precise location. Still, even in New York City, a 40-story tower containing 900 apartments should be difficult to miss.

But the Census Bureau did. read more >>

Grant Makers Commit Millions to Help Ensure Accurate Census, At stake in the tally: More than $4-trillion in money governments apportion to the people charities serve

The Chronicle of Philanthropy by Marty Michaels

As the 2010 census nears its official start in March, nonprofit leaders are raising serious concerns about the government’s ability to achieve an accurate tally in this once-a-decade population count.

In response, foundations have poured tens of millions of dollars into nonprofit census efforts, but many nonprofit leaders say much more is needed.read more >>

Syndicate content

Members are encouraged to sign in to view member-only content. 

credits | terms of use | give us feedback | © 2008 Funders' Committee for Civic Participation | 221 NW Second Avenue, Suite 207 Portland, OR 97209 | P: 503-505-5703